![]() Of note is this particular section with commentary: This is a relevant article from ByzantineTexas: But, you have to wonder if they received permission from their respective patriarchs to go, or, if they went rogue on their own. You use sophistry, ambiguity and half truths from the top down in order to unofficially change the teachings. In Roman Catholicism you don’t have to “officially” change teachings for the praxis of belief in Roman Catholicism to change. You can bet that where there is a Jesuit leading something that this is the case. This synod, like Vatican 2, is a Trojan horse to allow more aberrations in. The problem of course is that this gathering is not what this is really about conciliarity is merely the window-dressing for what the modernists within the Catholic Church really want, which is female ordination and the blessing of homoerotic unions. Let’s not forget that after the false council of Florence the Greeks chased their bishops out of town, at least the ones who were pro-Florence. Roman Catholicism does not have that same allure. ![]() I think the reason they went along with the OCU, at least some of the bishops, is because the OCU is an internal Orthodox affair and at least has the trappings of Orthodoxy, even if they are schismatics. Greece and Cyprus) were there.įrom what I gather the majority of Greeks in those countries are pretty anti-Catholic, at least as far as a union goes. Interestingly enough, no bishops from the two other Greek-speaking Churches (i.e. My hunch is a resounding “they do not care” and have bought into the “mission.” Alexandria I’m not really surprised… And it ain’t gonna be pretty.ġ00%… I touched on this in my previous post.ĭo the four Orthodox bishops who attended the opening ceremony not see this? Or do they not care? It is possible that it is the globalists who have drawn their own line in the sand and they really don’t care what the consequences are.Īnyway, the fallout from this Synod as far as the Catholic Church is concerned will be significant. Do the four Orthodox bishops who attended the opening ceremony not see this? Or do they not care? Perhaps they will be disciplined.Īnyway, the fallout from this Synod as far as the Catholic Church is concerned will be significant. It’s also possible that when it comes to their respective synods, they are outliers. You’d think given Serhei Dumenko’s uniate/globalist sympathies, he’d have been welcomed there with open arms.Īs for the three bishops who did attend, I must assume that they are sympathetic to the globalist agenda themselves. Nor for that matter was any bishop from the fake Ukrainian sect created by Bartholomew. (It’s as if they are drawing a line in the sand, “We went along with you in the Ukraine, but we won’t go along with you any further”.) On the other hand, we can look at who was not there: neither Russia, Bulgaria, Antioch, Georgia, Jerusalem, et al, sent any of their bishops. ![]() In other words, its stated goal is to recognize that the Christian Church for the first millennium was a conciliar Church and not a top-down autocracy. In fact, to the extent that this Synod tries to undo the last one thousand years of hyper-papalism, it’s not a bad things at all. So, too, did bishops Alexandria, Romania and Serbia. Patriarch Bartholomew decided to attend the opening ceremony and give an invocation. As you can see, Patriarch Bartholomew as well as three other Orthodox bishops wanted to get in on the fun as well. Unfortunately, the globalist heresy isn’t confined to Catholicism. This is a horrendous turn of events as far as the Tradcats/Radtrads are concerned, and –all things being equal–it really should have no bearing on those of us in the Orthodox Church. That is, when it comes to Pope Francis and his never-ending antics.įor those who may (or may not know), his much anticipated “Synod on Synodality” commenced the other day.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |